Small tools that help you see your own work clearly. Free for students. Open source.
AI qualifies · Code judges · AI narrates
Try the tools Support the practiceCo-created by Prayas Abhinav + Claude Code
Language is probabilistic, fluid, generative — AI handles it well. Judgement is deterministic, rule-bound, auditable — code handles it well. They require different treatments. Asking a language model to make judgements is asking a probabilistic text generator to produce deterministic verdicts. The work may come out right, but there is no way to know when, and no way to adjust what you cannot inspect.
The difference in practice
The separated version is auditable, consistent, and adjustable. When standards change, you update the rules — not retrain the AI.
Each tool does one thing. Free to use. Source available. See all tools →
Paste scattered text fragments. See where they cluster, diverge, contradict, or echo. Four signals measure meaning, vocabulary, emotion, and voice. Six deterministic rules surface structural relationships. Claude Haiku narrates what the rules found.
Select three experiential qualities from twelve — anticipation, tension, relief, discovery, and more. See whether your combination is harmonic, distinct, dynamic, complex, or paradoxical. User selection replaces AI classification; embedding similarities determine relationships.
Paste a design concept. Get a diagnostic across five dimensions — what's solid, what's thin, what's unclear. A domain-trained DeBERTa model qualifies the text, deterministic rules apply judgement thresholds, Claude Haiku narrates the result.
Open source. Coherence, Play Shape, and Fragment Mapper are MIT licensed. Tools published after 5 April 2026 are AGPL-3.0. Verify your email to try hosted demos (10 free analyses, no account). Or clone any repo and run locally.