Guided tour · toward responsible-AI / governance
Ethics
What Koher refuses, and why — the verdict it will not pass, the data it will not keep, the scale it will not chase. Leads toward responsible-AI, governance and policy work.
A curated path — each step points at the exact passage, not just a page. Read it in order, or wander. Links open in a new tab so the map stays put.
-
The one commitment
Keep a real outside in the room — the ethical core everything else defends.
→Why Koher exists -
People hold the conversation
The voice between people stays human; AI is private augmentation, never the witness.
→People Hold the Conversation — The refusal -
Describe, do not grade
Refusing the AI verdict: legibility for contestation, not measurement for control.
→Keep a Real Outside — Legibility, not measurement -
Serve people, not institutions
No accounts, no profiles, no freemium — the same depth for everyone.
→Values — Serve People, Not Institutions -
What is not collected
The data ethics in plain terms — what Koher does not keep.
→Privacy -
Density is not mass
Refusing scale-as-good — why bigger is not the aim, and what guards against it.
→Density Is Not Mass — The Shadow Guard -
The user’s dignity
What an honest tool asks of itself when a person’s attention is the thing at stake.
→The User Has Somewhere Else to Be — What it asks of an AI tool -
The facet you would own
The refusal work: what a tool will not do, its boundaries and consent design. This is responsible-AI practice.
→Back to the apprenticeship
Or try the other way in: Engineering for designers tour